Alleged Nanking Massacre? Name:caitianlong Date:2010/07/19(Mon) 01:51 No.124 Please... To contest a well-documented and established historical event in the name of pride is simply too much for me to let go. With countless eye witness testimonies, pictures of the events, and even intact remnants still in Nanjing, to question the atrocity that happened there and deny it is just too much. Japan is a nation of genius and brilliance, it should not result to this shameful and dishonorable denial. whitelotus > Again, none of those so-called eyewitness accounts and testimonies has been investigated and verified yet. (7/22-12:04) No.130 |
DB's very bad info biased! Name:Aki Date:2010/03/06(Sat) 21:49 No.115 There were no massacre for the civilians at all in Nanking in that time period, please read in 166 pages caitianlong > No massacre of civillians was perpetrated? Please check up on your facts... (7/19-01:53) No.125 whitelotus > caitianlong, why don't you check up the facts by yourself? (7/22-12:03) No.129 |
don't focus on the number Name:tom Date:2010/01/12(Tue) 23:43 No.98 just focus on what your ancesters did on that massacre. whitelotus > OK. Tell me what happened to those pregnant women who, according to you, were supposed to be raped by the Japanese soldiers? Where are the bodies? Killing people...., burning houses....., those were what the bandits in China had done in centuries. (1/14-17:15) No.101 jimmy > just because things of a similar nature may have occurred before does not give the japanese soldiers the right to kill and rape innocent civilians (2/7-16:11) No.104 whitelotus > There is no proof to prove the Japaense soldiers killed and/or raped innocent civillians. (2/9-09:20) No.109 caitianlong > As for proof, there are countless! Pictures even. Please check them up, a simple search engine type up will yield millions of results. If you proceed there validity, refer to scholarly texts even, you'll be surprised to find more. (7/19-01:55) No.126 fenetic > whitelotus, are you retarded? if you even bothered to look for proof you will see that theres countless of photographs, documentations etc. STOP LIVING IN DENIAL JAPAN! (7/21-06:19) No.127 whitelotus > caitanlong and fenetic, has any ofthose so-called photographs and documentations ever been verified and proven as first-hand documentations? For example, if you want to bring some photos as evidences, you have to provide the info regarding who took them, where, when, and under what kind of circumstances they were taken. If those info are not provided, photos are just photos, nothing else. (7/22-12:02) No.128 |
feel sorry for long absence Name:Aki Date:2009/06/12(Fri) 02:40 No.79 I have been in physical problems, now OK so I am very pleased to come back here, many thanks for tokyo bystander and aiz for your so good comments for the naive and anti-Japan parties/persons. fuck you > Japan == faggots!! (4/26-01:30) No.116 whitelotus > The Chinese are the yellow uncle Toms who have no guts to accuse the Western nations which did occupy various parts of China. (5/6-14:03) No.123 |
LOL Name:Noah Date:2010/04/30(Fri) 11:40 No.119 Damn Japs who kept denying this ............ whitelotus > Learning from German? Learning what? You mean only apologizing to the Jews and Polish, and not doing anything for the former colonies they had in Africa and Pacific? Remember, Mao Tse Tung and his Communist Party were the worst of worst; killed way more than Hiter and Stalin combined. (5/6-14:02) No.122 |
japan scum Name:japan Date:2010/04/26(Mon) 01:31 No.117 small dicks in japan cannot rape! therefore rape cannot happens. very true statement > hahaha... this is so true! must be true! this film must be correct then!! (4/26-01:34) No.118 edgerf > small dicks in japanese proven cannot rape!!!!! (5/1-01:11) No.120 whitelotus > Then, tell me how come Japan has its 100 million population? (5/6-13:59) No.121 |
i do hate uncle sam!! Name:Aki Date:2010/03/06(Sat) 21:35 No.114 you should lean and study about the historical facts rather than before the very emotional and naive saying. |
We Are The World Name:DB Date:2010/02/28(Sun) 14:12 No.112 Let's assume, for a second, that Japanese soldiers did NOT kill or rape any innocent civilians, did NOT conduct inhumane tests on civilians, etc. whitelotus > =>Is it jealousy of Japan? Is it diplomatic revenge for being invaded? Both China and South Korea have still blindly been following the age-old Sino-centrick hierarchy, which placed China as the center of the universe, and Korea the second. Virtually every Asian nation used to be the tributary states of China in ancient time. When Japan became the first one to broke off with China in the 7th century, others soon followed the path, of course, partly due to the Western colonization. But Korea had been loyal to China until the very end of the 19th century. While Japan has been the leading nation of Asia with much to offer, Korea has still been struggling to promote their nation due to the almost 1,000 year history of being the faithful tributary state of China. Both China and Korea cannot stand Japan, which according to the Sino-centric universe, is supposed to be inferior to them, has been more successful and command international respects. In case you haven't studied in school, it was the Western nations such as Britain, which first invaded and occupied China. Britain, along with France, Germany, others occupied certain parts of China as their territories, but do you know why has no Chinese ever been loud against them for the occupations? Because the Chinese in general are scared to speak up against the caucasians. They and other Asians have this ever unshakable inferiority complex toward the Westerners. Therefore, they have to find some scapegort to relief their angers. The scapegoat has often been Japan. =>When we start nit-picking for "proof", or if people start suggesting,"you have no proof that it was 300,000 instead of 30,000" -- then yes, no one can prove the EXACT number. However, the Japanese cannot DISPROVE it either. There are the proofs with which we can disprove your claims. First, there is the Documents of the Nanking Safety Zone, which was published in Shanghai by the British company; Kelly & Walsh in 1939. The documents were recorded under the auspices of the Council of International Affairs of the Nationalist government of Chiang Kai Shiek. The documents clearly stated that the population prior to the arrival of the Japanese Army was around 200,000. And after the arrival, it increased to 250,000. You can go to some local library to find the documents. There are others, like the report by Dr. Lewis Smyth, who resided in Nanking at that time. You can read the free online book in the following link: http://www.history.gr.jp/~nanking/books_wardamage.html =>Proof in the form of John Rabe, first-hand accounts from survivors, etc. are, as the Japanese say, "not enough", "unfounded" or "inconsistent". On December 18, 1937, John Rabe sent the letter to the Imperial Japanese Embassy and asked the help for providing food and security for the 200,000 people in Nanking because it was too much a job for the mere 22 Westerners in the area including Rabe himself. In the report of the Nanking Safety Zone on January 14, 1937, he stated that the population of Nanking was estimated 250,000 to 300,000. On the other hand, his so-called diary has has the questionable accounts partly due to the fact Rabe himself and/or other rewrote them. To make long story short, Rabe eventually became anti-Japan due to Hitler's decision to seek help from Japan to combat Russia. Rabe had been in charge of supplying weaponry to Chiang Kai Shiek's KMT Army. But because of Hitler's new policy, he began to lose the lucrative benefits. Thus, he began to make false reports regarding the Japanese Army and its actions in China. For example, in the report he wrote for Hitler, Rabe explained the number of the so-called Nanking victims was 50,000 to 60,000. Then, on January 14, 1938, he sent the letter to the German Embassy in Shanghai, in which he stated the victim was several 1,000 people. And on January 28, he sent the letter to the English Embassy in Nanking, in which he stated the victim was several 100 people. If you read his so-called diary carefully, there is no single case of murder he directly witnessed recorded. All of the so-called murder was based on the heresays he heard from other sources. Now, tell me how could some 300,000 be killed when according to Rabe, there were 200,000 in December 1937? Why can his diary be the proof of the so-called massacre when Rabe himself provided different numbers to different people: ranging from 100 to 1,000? (3/3-12:43) No.113 |
i hate japs Name:uncle sam Date:2010/02/14(Sun) 16:06 No.110 bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the greatest decision in history. god only know what would life be now if those animals were not stop. truly, GOD BLESS AMERICA whitelotus > Do you really think so? If it were not for FDR's decision to start the war in the Pacific, your nation would not have had to lose so many young lives for fighting the Communists. (2/15-09:39) No.111 |
Let's Be Honest Name:MC Date:2009/10/19(Mon) 17:19 No.89 Let's look at this logically. whitelotus > Has any of those so-called "testimonies" ever verified and proven with any first-hand documentation? Those former Japanese "soldiers" were imprisoned in China for years, thus, their accounts too have to be thoroughly examined. (11/4-18:04) No.91 Akira > Who's saying "it's all false"? Typical Talmudic argumentum ad absurdum. (11/15-13:26) No.95 lena > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radhabinod_Pal (12/21-03:11) No.97 jimmy > john rabe diaries... need i say anymore (2/7-16:14) No.105 whitelotus > John Rabe provided different numbers of the so-called Nanking victims to different people. Take a look at the Documents of the Nanking Safety Zone. You don't have to look further. (2/9-09:20) No.108 |
Sondre/Julia Name:Aki Date:2009/06/14(Sun) 21:07 No.84 Many thanks for your serious and good comments, I once jimmy > mate your fuckin high.. cant you see the japanese government has brainwashed the majority of Japanese people (2/7-16:16) No.106 whitelotus > Brainwashing was the tool developed by the Communists. Japan has been the nation of the much freer access of information. You cannot say the same for China, from which Google has been considering to withdraw. (2/9-09:18) No.107 |
long time to debate again Name:Aki Date:2010/01/24(Sun) 02:26 No.103 Dear DCB and tom, |
.... Name:DCB Date:2009/10/20(Tue) 08:43 No.90 This film is an April Fool's Joke, right? whitelotus > It is already in fall of 2009. What the hell are you talking about? (11/4-18:04) No.92 tom > definately a fucking joke. you japanese crossed the sea to slave Korea and China, which killed millions of people, why we should not explode your fucking ass with atomic bombs? (1/12-23:52) No.100 whitelotus > Japan has no tradition of slavery. If you talking about those comfort women, then they were just paid prostitutes with the different name. The majority of them were actually Japanese anyway. What is the big deal with Korea and China? Afterall, it was the Western powers like Britain and France, which started the whole colonization things. They did lot more killings than Japan ever did. According to your logic, they deserve the atomic bombs as well. (1/14-17:18) No.102 |
Let's be REAL honest Name:lena Date:2009/12/21(Mon) 03:10 No.96 God bless for brave people who made this movie! tom > you are such a naive babe. but , yes, you should learn more. (1/12-23:46) No.99 |
To MC Name:Tokyo bystander Date:2009/11/07(Sat) 20:07 No.94 "China and South Korea, have hundreds of photos, testimonies, witnesses, and accounts of the 'Rape of Nanjing'?? |
40,000 killed at Nanking Name:Edward Chen Date:2009/09/27(Sun) 04:02 No.88 Dear Sir, whitelotus > Thanks. I have recently discovered the rare report by Dr. Lewis Smyth, who resided in Nanking at that time. You can read the free online book in the following link: http://www.history.gr.jp/~nanking/books_wardamage.html (11/4-18:07) No.93 |
コラ Name:コラ Date:2009/09/01(Tue) 17:34 No.87 コラ |
無題 Name:tomo Date:2009/08/29(Sat) 18:44 No.86 i respect the thought of this movie. |
aiz/tokyo bystander Name:Aki Date:2009/06/14(Sun) 21:27 No.85 Both comments are super to give good answers to |
fen/connels naiveness Name:Aki Date:2009/06/14(Sun) 20:36 No.83 So sorry and dissapointed for fen/connels/julia who do not know and learn the facts what Nanking issue was made |